|
subnixus wordpress themes, mature porn board , drum & bass, my mother fucking change , privacy, plugin, 200, earn money, older lesbian sex , weekly, actors, mature pussy com , mature slut galleries , mature porn site reviews , sexy mature movies , music downloads, eff, mature women nude galleries , mature ladies porn , mature nude females , kevin connolly, mother fucking son video , electronic music, mature and boy movies ,
|
Actually, that's incorrect. The distribution of maple state by maple state poverty rates would not tell us a thing in this case. What one would need is a distribution of the state by state increase in poverty rates. Mouthpiece [ ...reply just to this | comment on the story... | next new ] 55. Re: True, but not decisive. by zyxwvutsr at Wed 31 Aug 12:50pmscore of 1 astute in reply to comment 47 I don't find the geographic maple concentration in these states to be quite so intense as to merit saying thatOnly 7 out of the 50 states saw an increase in poverty, and all were in one area of the country. How intense would a geographical distribution have to be before you would find it compelling? That the increase was concentrated to a degree should not obscure the fact that these changes aren't just part of random variation between states...I haven't claimed that the variation is random — in fact I think it is unlikely to be random since the states where poverty increased are mostly contiguous.
|
