 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| motherfucker, dining, postings, perfect, game, pam\'shouse blend, kevin dillon, jeremy piven, independant, discussion, fantastic, mother son., name development, db2, bfd, cunt, academe, deep house, comments, | | next new ] 104. Re: More jobs... at Walmart by zyxwvutsr at Thu 1 Sep 8:39amscore of 1 in reply to comment 84 Okay, I'll have surveillance one last nitpick, too. The Gini index is utterly irrelevant if the question is whether the typical American household is doing better or worse. If you refer back to the surveillance historical income tables once again, you will see that the long term trend is that every quintile has been gaining, in real terms. This was happening even as the Gini index for the population was steadily rising over the same surveillance period. Also, income distribution is only a Lorenz curve if you plot it as a Lorenz curve. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| As you say, the median income statistic is not a good descriptor at name development all of the name development kinds of shifts you name development describe; but by definition, the flat state of median income from 2003-4 does show that zyx's initial statement is untrue, or perhaps just badly worded. A one-to-many relationship regarding minimum wage jobs and high-paying jobs created that zyx initially suggested would mean the median income would rise. But it did not. Therefore, either jobs paying below the median and above were added in roughly equal numbers, or the kind of shift you describe was taking place. In either case, the median income statistic will not reveal that change. It's all interconnected; it's all complicated. That's why it requires our attention. - Jon Carroll, SFChronicle [ ...reply just to this | comment on the story... |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
