|
evocative names, bizrate.com, newsgeek, dmca, verses, branding consultants, record, mother sucks son, seattleweekly, weird, intellectual property, drm,
|
That almost certainly is probable cause, and because it's an espionage- and national security-related issue, the FISA court could readily be expected to issue a warrant for this. In terms of spying on Americans, satanic however, there satanic must be a warrant. Article 4 of the constitution asserts this. With regards to whatever 'War powers' the satanic president might or might not have, he was explicitly denied the exercise of those powers in the US by Congress. When the White House asked the House to explicitly place US territory within the scope of the bill giving the president the right to use all means necessary, they refused. This is a matter of public record. It is therefore proven that Congress authorised no such program, and the warrant-less surveillance of individuals on US soil is illegal and unconstitutional. Again, you're right to say that the issue of whether the president should conduct unwarranted surveillance on US soil is controversial and hotly debated. The issue of whether it is legal to do so today is not.
|
