 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| local, mother sucks son., career, nanotech, headlines, professor, free porn, gnome, the traveller, statement, hip hop, there goes the neighborhood, celebrity, three6 mafia sleep lyrics, r'n'b, pda, editor, world music, arrested, blunt, jr.com, mandana beigi, opensource, | Not surprisingly the news media tends to focus on the most recent data. You pointed out how you thought that mother son might be misleading, I merely pointed mother son out how viewing mother son a single year is potentially misleading. (The report you linked to, by the way, does not discuss poverty rates.) Yes, my mistake it does show the trends in household income in much more detail for the report on poverty for 2000. Whatever time frame you pick, my point is that your conclusion that the decline in poverty is limited in scope is more an artifact of looking at a narrow time frame and the limits of statistics. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| Why not local over 10 years? Or twenty? I guess if you picked any period of more than 4 years it would undermine your argument. 2000 is a statistical local anomaly: it had the lowest poverty rate in a quarter century, and nearly the lowest rate in history. Why pick 4 years? Perhaps because thats when Bush took office. How else do you propose to evaluate the trend in the nation since he took office? The 2000 report discusses the prior years as well. A year isnt much to go by. However, whatever time frame you want local to pick, the record is bad. In any case, the primary topic of the writeup was a comparison between 2003 and 2004, and my comment was addressing that topic. As for the "primary topic" try reading the actual topic: Poverty — A Growth Industry During The Bush Years. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
