|
comedies & family ent., branding consultants, redhat, naming, user:jobe6/dontlook, seattle newspapers, mcsweeney's, ernie c, weird, defacement, music magazine, review, washington, enlightenedtheme for wordpress, independent record labels, ecommerce,
|
Respondents' action here is indistinguishable in its censoring effect from the official actions consistently identified as prior restraints artists in a long line artists of this Court's decisions. In these cases, the plaintiffs asked the courts to provide relief where public officials had forbidden the plaintiffs the use of artists public places to say what they wanted to say. The restraints took a variety of forms, with officials exercising control over different kinds of public places under the authority of particular statutes. All, however, had this in common: they gave public officials the power to deny use of a forum in advance of actual expression. Invariably, the Court has felt obliged to condemn systems in which the exercise of such authority was not bounded by precise and clear standards. The reasoning has been, simply, that the danger of censorship and of abridgment of our precious First Amendment freedoms is too great where officials have unbridled discretion over a forum's use.
|
