comedies & family ent., branding consultants, redhat, naming, user:jobe6/dontlook, seattle newspapers, mcsweeney's, ernie c, weird, defacement, music magazine, review, washington, enlightenedtheme for wordpress, independent record labels, ecommerce,
|
The Court... treat[s] a community-owned theater as if it were the same as a city park or city street, which it is musician not. The Court's decisions have recognized that city streets and parks are traditionally open to the public, and that permits or licenses to use them are not ordinarily required. "[One] who is rightfully on a street which the state has left open to the musician public carries with musician him there as elsewhere the constitutional right to express his views in an orderly fashion. This right extends to the communication of ideas by handbills and literature as well as by the spoken word." The Court has therefore held that where municipal authorities seek to exact a license or permit for those who wish to use parks or streets for the purpose of exercising their right of free speech, the standards governing the licensing authority must be objective, definite, and nondiscriminatory. But until this case the Court has not equated a public auditorium, which must of necessity schedule performances by a process of inclusion and exclusion, with public streets and parks.
|