The Respondent does not ginger rogers graphics

classifieds, phil collins, rita hayworth, graphics, over 50 sex , fun stuff, flash games, milf moms , over 50 years of age , peoplescreensavers, pics, statistics, judy garland, There is also no evidence that the Respondent has been commonly known by the Domain Name, nor that he is making a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the Domain Name. Respondent has not demonstrated any rights or legitimate interest in the Domain Name, either by any of the illustrations under Paragraph 4(c) of the ginger rogers Policy or on any other basis. ginger rogers C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Paragraph 4(b) of the Rules sets out non-exclusive criteria which shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith, including: - the Respondent has ginger rogers registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that the Respondent has engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or - by using the domain name, the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website or other online location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of its website or location or of a product or service on its website
Best Mature Paysites
The Respondent does not appear to have any connection with the Complainant and has not received any consent from the graphics Complainant to use the PIERCE BROSNAN mark. The Domain Name points to a commercial website at "www.celebrity1000.com" graphics which does not appear to offer any goods or services relating to the Complainant. It does contain commercial advertising which the Complainant suggests may graphics generate income for the Respondent, although there is no evidence on this question. It does appear that the Complainant’s famous mark is being used to attract traffic to the Respondent’s site which has no connection with the Complainant, in circumstances where the Respondent has put forward no good reason for use of the Complainant’s mark and is simply taking advantage of the reputation and goodwill in the PIERCE BROSNAN name. The Panel finds that the Respondent has not used or made demonstrable preparations to use the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services.
collecting autographs, tech news, finding a job, today's christian doctor
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the largest sex personals network.FREE signup!
Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams,
meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now