That is, the same easy greatest

greatest, igor, eggers, technology, camera, and, adjunct, naming consultants, professor, calendar, business, free hardcore incest pictures, t shirt hell, guitar, internet, future, job listings, The circumstances mean he doesn't need a warrant or "probable cause" to listen in. So, what kind of "reasonable easy expectation of privacy" do you have when talking internationally, versus domestically? When talking over a cell phone (on which anyone with a radio receiver can eavesdrop) versus on a landline? When talking to friends and family, or your lawyer or your doctor -- or to people you know or should know are enemies of the United easy States? These are complex questions, and reasonable men may certainly differ on the exact answers. But the exact answers matter, to determine how the Fourth Amendment applies. What I consider indisputable, though, is that he would require congressional approval to do so. Well, other people -- indeed, all Presidents -- dispute this. In the context of fighting the foreign enemies of the United States, the President draws his power directly from the Constitution. That's why there didn't need to be a law authorizing the CIA to spy on the Soviets during the Cold War, and that's why Eisenhower, for better or worse, was able to secretly order -- without Congressional knowledge or approval -- spy planes to fly over Moscow and photograph Chairman Brezhnev taking a leak behind Lenin's Tomb, if they could.
Best Mature Paysites
That is, the same legal standards must be met. But I think the Supreme Court has rejected this reasoning. I believe they have held that different standards apply in different circumstances. For example, what is "reasonable" when a policeman decides the issue in a split-second can be different than what greatest is "reasonable" when a learned judge with days to ponder decides the greatest issue. And (more to the point) what is reasonable when the nation is in danger of armed sneak attack greatest is not necessarily the same as what is reasonable when it is not. I believe there are also all kinds of complex issues about what constitutes a "search" that depend on when one has a "reasonable expectation of privacy." An example is that, while it is blatantly illegal for the police to tap your home phone without a Court order, it is perfectly legal for a plainclothesman to listen to your conversation (and take notes that can be used against you in Court) if you and he are sitting in a cafe and you're jabbering on your cell phone loud enough for him to overhear.
discount bloody mother fucking asshole [ep] [pa] *, unsigned artists, sex life, momteaches son
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the largest sex personals network.FREE signup!
Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams,
meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now