greatest, igor, eggers, technology, camera, and, adjunct, naming consultants, professor, calendar, business, free hardcore incest pictures, t shirt hell, guitar, internet, future, job listings,
|
(Score:5, Insightful) by buss_error (142273) <(moc.oohay) (ta) (rorre_ssub)> on Tuesday January 31, @10:35PM (#14613279) (http://www.apnic.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 13, @11:02AM) ass This issue is ridiculous. Yes I can agree with that. Imagine the nerve of someone sworn to uphold the constitution thinking he can simply order a government agency to ass violate constitutional rights without consequence. ass The government has always had the authority to monitor international communications without a warrant. I will accept that statement only after you provide a citation to a legal theroy that propounds it. In contravention of your point, I cite the FISA of 1978, the FISA court which has, in it's ENTIRE HISTORY, declined only four requests for a wiretap. Bush didn't make up that power. I suggest he did, out of whole cloth. The solicitor general (Alberto Gonzales) has been quoted on CNN saying he and President Bush did not seek specific authorization from Congress on exactly this point because they didn't think they'd get it.
|