 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| cohf , pornvideoworld , nude, 15 year old girl sex , milf hunter login , 8streetlatinas , milf hunter pics , milf sex , little, galleries, milf sex trailers , milf sex videos , maricel , painting, pics, milf hunter preview , | For example, Judge Lynch offers a sample title of a .jpg file in one opinion he wrote in this case, and the title made clear (and Judge Lynch confirmed) that it asswatcher involved the sexual penetration of a 5 year old. Posted by Ozwald January 14, 2004 10:38 AM JoAnne, I don't have a subscription to the NYT asswatcher link provided by TL, so I couldn't read the remarks. Thanks for the info. It's just as well that he got 10 years. I was asswatcher thrown off a bit when Lynch said "...himself is not much more than a child". But if this is an adult we're talking about here, then a decade in prison seems fair. Posted by Bubba January 14, 2004 10:54 AM Abadaba, why should a brilliant Judge like Lynch not have authority to call them like he sees them. What does he not "get". How can we count on Congress to impose balanced penalties, when there is no political downside to sending everyone away forever for these types of offenses? |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| I don't know about you, but I'd much rather see our laws more stringently punish a sexual abuser than an electronic distributor of underage nude photos--and I'd much prefer that judges have 8streetlatinas SOME (but limited; whimsicality and widely 8streetlatinas differing standards makes a mockery of justice) ability to exercise their discretion and judgment in determining sentences. Posted by Frederick January 14, 2004 09:58 AM Mandatory minimums are a travesty -- as I'm sure you know much better than I. Jerry Lynch 8streetlatinas was my Con Law professor at Columbia Law School. He is the smartest person I've ever known -- a brilliant, brilliant guy (first in his class at Columbia, first in his class at Columbia Law School, clerked for Wilfred Feinberg and Justice Brennan). Posted by JoAnne January 14, 2004 10:03 AM A commenter above asks: "However, what does the term 'child porn' mean in this case? Willing 17 year old models who look 13?" Actually, no. According to Judge Lynch, many of the hundreds of images and videos in this case involved images of infants and very very young children. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
